<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smarter Messaging [Mike Jones, UK] &#187; Hardware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.smartermessaging.com/tag/hardware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.smartermessaging.com</link>
	<description>How do we enable smarter conversations?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yes, Symantec still make appliances&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.smartermessaging.com/2007/06/28/yes-symantec-still-make-appliances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smartermessaging.com/2007/06/28/yes-symantec-still-make-appliances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symantec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smartermessaging.com/2007/06/28/yes-symantec-still-make-appliances/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; and they&#8217;re very good.
If you searched on our good friend Google for &#8220;Symantec appliances&#8221; you&#8217;d get the following results as the top two:

Symantec turns off on security appliances &#124; The Register
Symantec is scaling down its hardware offering by pulling the plug on a range of network security appliances. The vendor will stop designing and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and they&#8217;re very good.</p>
<p>If you searched on our good friend Google for &#8220;Symantec appliances&#8221; you&#8217;d get the following <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=symantec+appliances&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;meta=" title="Google search results">results</a> as the top two:</p>
<blockquote>
<h3><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/27/symantec_appliances/" class="l"><strong>Symantec</strong> turns off on security <strong>appliances</strong> | The Register</a></h3>
<p><font size="-1"><strong>Symantec</strong> is scaling down its hardware offering by pulling the plug on a range of network security <strong>appliances</strong>. The vendor will stop designing and making the <strong>&#8230;</strong><br />
<span class="a"><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/27/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/27/</a><strong>symantec</strong>_<strong>appliances</strong>/</span></font></p>
<h3><a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2159677/gartner-advises-avoiding" class="l">Avoid <strong>Symantec appliances</strong>, says Gartner &#8211; vnunet.com</a></h3>
<p><font size="-1">Analyst firm predicts that <strong>Symantec</strong> will exit market sector.</font><br />
<font size="-1"><span class="a"><a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/" rel="nofollow">http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/</a><wbr></wbr>2159677/gartner-advises-avoiding</span></font></p></blockquote>
<p>Oh dear, that doesn&#8217;t bode well for me in my new role at <a href="http://www.symantec.com" title="Symantec">Symantec</a> where my two focus products at the moment are <a href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/products/overview.jsp?pcid=2244&amp;pvid=322_1" title="Enterprise Vault">Enterprise Vault</a> (formerly KVS, archiving software) and the <a href="http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/products/overview.jsp?pcid=2242&amp;pvid=1721_1" title="8300 series">Mail Security 8300 Series</a> <strong>appliance</strong>! I&#8217;ve only been in the role two weeks and I&#8217;ve already overheard colleagues describe themselves loosing business because &#8220;.. we don&#8217;t do appliances&#8221;. I repeat, yes, Symantec still make appliances&#8230; and they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.securecomputing.net.au/review/symantec-mail-security-8300.aspx" title="SC review">very</a> <a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/ESGPublications/download.asp?ReportAttachment=Attachment1&amp;ReportID=792" title="Review [PDF]">good</a>! They don&#8217;t make the hardware, it&#8217;s well spec&#8217;d Dell kit, but they do everything else involved in getting an appliance developed and with customers.</p>
<p>The communication problem stems from an exit from making appliance hardware and <a href="http://www.juniper.net/company/presscenter/pr/2006/pr-060912.html" title="Announcement on partnership">forming a partnership</a> with <a href="http://www.juniper.net" title="Main Juniper site">Juniper</a> that occurred mid-last year. The releases weren&#8217;t particularly clear and the press certainly focused on the &#8220;stopping making appliances&#8221; part of them. I&#8217;m still not fully clear on what has happened/is happening with those &#8220;SNS&#8221; and &#8220;SGS&#8221; products but &#8220;SMS&#8221; (Symantec Mail Security) is going strong. Amusingly the road-map code names for the upcoming releases are mountain names which keep getting higher and higher&#8230; I hope they&#8217;re pacing themselves on the way to Everest! Though I hear sub-ocean mountains are higher&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a challenge reversing the perception that Symantec don&#8217;t make appliances and that they are a worthy and safe investment for customers to make but I&#8217;m sure our team is up to the task! The most frustrating thing for me so far is working out what is publicly promotable about the products and what is &#8220;secret&#8221;. Everything seems to be marked &#8220;Internal Only&#8221; by default and only gets made &#8220;External&#8221; if someone asks the right person the right question about the right material and they agree. I&#8217;m still trying to discover the best way for me to change that without stepping on too many toes or ruffling too many feathers!</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smartermessaging.com/2007/06/28/yes-symantec-still-make-appliances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
